SugarSync vs Dropbox

obrBy Rahul Dasgupta — Last Updated: 14 May'18 2015-02-05T07:13:15+00:00Google+
SugarSync vs Dropbox

When it comes to cloud storage can SugarSync be an alternative to Dropbox or vice versa? Anyone opting for solutions pertaining to cloud backup will essentially look for unbounded bandwidth and no restrictions as far as file size storage is concerned.

However, there are other parameters that will decide which is better—Dropbox vs SugarSync.

Although there are various other contenders, these two stand out from the rest in a number of ways and deserve to be compared. To help determine which one to choose, here is a detailed comparison.

The Battle for Storage Supremacy — SugarSync vs Dropbox

Starts from$ 6 25monthly for 100 GB
Visit SugarSyncSugarSync Review
  • Syncs any folder
  • No file-size limit
  • Versioning
  • Supports most OSes
  • Relatively expensive
  • No free tier
  • Slow browser downloading
  • No collaboration tools
Starts from$ 9 92monthly for 1000 GB
Visit DropboxDropbox Review
  • Very fast sync
  • MS Office Online Integration
  • Dropbox Paper
  • Only up to 1TB
  • Expensive
  • Not zero knowledge
  • No 24/7 support

SugarSync vs. Dropbox - Battle of Cloud Storage Services


SugarSync was setup back in 2008 and has its base in San Mateo, CA. It has millions of users globally and many loyal clients and partners that include SanDisk, Best Buy, Lenovo, Korea Telecom, and Telecom-Orange.


These relationships give SugarSync an advantage when competing with the behemoths in the cloud storage industry. It has started gaining a good reputation in the market because of its feature-rich service. SugarSync allows easy backup, synchronization, and access to documents from any location and from any computer or mobile device.

Earlier, it offered 5GB of free storage space, but last year, SugarSync transitioned to paid service only with a free 30-day trial offering.


Dropbox is a leading cloud storage service provider serving more than 300 million users globally.

It was launched in 2007 by two MIT students, Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi. Like the famous saying “Necessity is the mother of invention,” Dropbox was formed not because it was a compelling business idea, but because it solved the founders’ needs, which eventually proved to be a great way to resolve file sharing needs globally.

Dropbox Review 2016 | Find The Right Cloud

The idea sparked when the pair was in college and frustrated with emailing documents to each other every time when they worked on computers other than the ones the files were created on. That led them to set up a secure folder on a server that can be accessed from anywhere irrespective of the location. The idea took off rapidly and there was no turning back.



Cost is an important factor when it comes to buying any product or service, whether it’s a tangible product or cloud storage. Choosing the wrong price package can break a business in no time. So which service offers better prices?


Dropbox offers 2GB of free space, and then its pricing starts at $9.99/month under the package name Dropbox Pro and comes with 1TB of storage space, remote wipe, and additional sharing controls.

PlanDropbox PlusDropbox ProfessionalDropbox Business
Price Plan
$ 9 99monthly
$ 119 00yearly
$ 19 99monthly
$ 239 88yearly
$ 15 00monthly
$ 180 00yearly
Storage 1000 GB 1000 GB 2048 GB

Businesses that need unlimited storage space can avail themselves of the service at a price of $15/user/month with unlimited file recovery and file sharing controls. 


SugarSync doesn’t offer any free space and starts at a price of $9.99/month that comes with 100GB of storage. This proves to be a good plan for individuals when starting out. However, the service has more plans for individuals: $24.99/month with 250GB, which is the most popular among all its plans, and the other costs $39.99/month with 500GB.

Plan100GB250GB500GB1TB for Business
Price Plan
$ 7 49monthly
$ 74 99yearly
$ 9 99monthly
$ 99 99yearly
$ 18 95monthly
$ 189 50yearly
$ 55 00monthly
Storage 100 GB 250 GB 500 GB 500 GB

Contact SugarSync for annual pricing

SugarSync has two business plans as well: 1,000 GB for $55/month, and if the storage requirement exceeds 1,000 GB, then it offers custom plans tailored to the exact need.  Coincidentally, if the storage requirement is only 100GB, then you need to shell out exactly $9.99/month for either SugarSync or Dropbox.

Winner (Pricing): SugarSync


User experience plays a crucial role in the success of every product. No one wants to use a product that makes navigating the user interface miserable. So who wins the glory of best user-friendliness? Let’s find out.


Dropbox appears to be user-friendly for those who prefer to upload files from their hard drive. Once the information is placed in the folder, the data is automatically transferred to the desired cloud account. In addition, upon completion of data transfer, the information can then be synchronized across all devices, including mobile devices.

Dropbox Business Review

However, when it comes to transferring files using the web browser, the job can be tricky as the upload button is not clearly visible on the web-based user interface. Apart from the upload option, all other features seem to be clear and straightforward.

One good thing about Dropbox is that data can be sorted based on the file type, and sharing is easy.


With a single right click, any folder can be added to SugarSync once the registration and setup process is done.

An interesting feature it offers is that you can edit your file on an office PC and then access and work on it again from your home. It has a separate mobile app that works well for users who are mostly on the go.

Winner (Usability): Tie

Platform Compatibility

You may want to avoid storage service that does not gel with the device you are using. So this is the third point of comparison.


Dropbox is compatible with all popular platforms available such as BlackBerry, OS mobile, iOS, Android, MacOSX and Windows. Apps offered by Dropbox work well with Kindle Fire and Linux.

Dropbox has a simple features since it excludes settings that most users don’t need. But it’ill work with almost every platform under the sun.


SugarSync is compatible with all the major platforms as well, but unlike Dropbox, it doesn’t work on Linux and Kindle Fire. On the other hand, SugarSync works well with Symbian devices and Windows Mobile devices.

Also, it offers more features like allowing sync while roaming, and the abilities to change the sync interval and the video and photo backup destination. 

Winner (Platform Compatibility): Tie

Synchronization and File Sharing

Synchronization, and especially file sharing ability, could be an important selection criterion if you have a team.


Dropbox enables users to transfer all files into the Dropbox folder. These can then be organized by creating subdirectories, but the files must be in the folders first.

One feature that Dropbox users have always wanted is the ability to synchronize folders outside of a user’s Dropbox account, but according to Ilya Fushman, who leads Dropbox’s business and mobile products, it may not happen anytime soon


The so-called “Magic Briefcase” is created in both platforms when an attempt to share files is made. This briefcase will serve as a connector where all files are shared in an easier manner. However, there is an additional feature that SugarSync offers known as “Get Public Link.” This feature provides the address of the file that is being shared.

This unique link will be placed in the clipboard. In the event a file has to be shared, the unique link has to be forwarded to the recipient of the file. In order to disable the link, “Disable Link” has to be clicked. Users with access to these files can be granted permission for “view only” or “read only” access.

SugarSync lets the user decide which folder must be synchronized to the cloud. So, for example, if the intent is to synchronize the “My Documents” folder without moving it, then it’s easily possible with SugarSync. This is a better option over Dropbox for those users who don’t want to reorganize their hard drive to fit in cloud storage.

Winner (Synchronization and File Sharing): SugarSync


Every company needs a foolproof security system to ensure their confidential information isn’t exposed to outsiders. This is always a major concern for any company, from bootstrapped startups to giants like Google. One thing is for sure: security is not Dropbox’s forte. If you’re looking for secure Dropbox alternatives you can read our in-depth article.

Basically, there are two security concepts to understand. Services who offer local encryption where you control the encryption key and no-one else has access to your files. And services who store the keys on their servers. 

Option number 2 is inherently more insecure because third-party entities could force a service provider to open your files. If you control the encryption key this wouldn’t be possible. Both SugarSync and Dropbox “only” use encryption on transit and on their servers. No local encryption is in place.

For most users this level of security is acceptable – but if you have highly sensitive information you should use encrypt those files prior to uploading them to the cloud, no matter the service you use.  Do SugarSync and Dropbox implement robust security systems that meet users’ needs? Let’s explore.


Dropbox uses SSL 3.3 (TLS) encryption when file transfer takes place to and from servers. In order to carry out the file transfer, Dropbox uses AES 256-bit encryption. This arrangement offers adequate protection to the files while being shared.

However, last year its customers were targeted by a phishing scam that put Dropbox’s reputation at stake.

These attacks tried to steal users’ names and passwords by claiming that the targeted user or recipient has a file that can’t be shared over email because of its large size, and thus the users have to click on a link to access the file, but the links appear to be a fake Dropbox login page hosted on Dropbox itself.

Also, there was a glitch found where private information was searchable by any third party. Although Dropbox resolved this issue quickly, a good amount of sensitive data leaked before the problem was caught.


SugarSync wins this by a wide margin. In order to keep files secured, encryption is important, and like Dropbox, SugarSync uses SSL 3.3 encryption.

SugarSync offers a solid approach to security. It uses TLS encryption in transit and 256-bit AES at rest. These are industry standard protocols that should keep your data perfectly safe from attacks.

Winner (Security): SugarSync

File Recovery

There are times when you delete a file by mistake. This is when file recovery is of immense importance. With either program, you will be able to retrieve files. However, the manner in which users do so differs for each. Let’s look at how.


With Dropbox, all versions of files deleted in the past 30 days can be recovered. So even if you accidentally delete files, they shouldn’t be difficult to recover with just a few clicks. All that’s needed is to click on the trash icon at the top of the file browser near the search box that shows all the deleted files and restore options. 

Just click on the restore button and that’s it. Also, if you’ve deleted multiple files, you can easily restore them with simple keyboard shortcuts. If you want to restore files after 30 days has expired, you can do so with the help of Rat Pack property, which will recover all files for you at an extra cost.

If deletion and restoration become a recurring issue, then the best solution is to upgrade to the Extended Version History Feature. This helps to restore a deleted file at any point in time within a year of the deletion.


SugarSync keeps as many as five versions of the deleted files from the past for an unlimited period. If a file or folder gets deleted accidentally, it goes to the deleted items folder, which makes it easy to restore them. Files deleted from a shared folder go to the private shared items tab, and all you need to do is select the item you want to recover and click on restore.

If you plan to restore files using SugarSync’s web app, then the process is the same, but the user interface will be a bit different.

With its web app, once you select the item to recover on the private shared items section, a blue-colored action menu will appear at the top of the deleted items list. Upon clicking it, the restore icon appears with a trash sign with an arrow; just click on it and the recovery will occur smoothly.


The selection of a cloud storage provider mostly depends on individual storage needs. Some users like the fact that Dropbox offers 2 GB of free space, and so they prefer to go with it and plan to upgrade once needed, whereas others prefer to explore SugarSync with its free trial and are happy to subscribe for the service as it can be more customized to their requirements than Dropbox.

The competition is close. Because we need to declare a winner, we choose SugarSync as it won two rounds, but Dropbox is not far behind. SugarSync overall provides larger flexibility, both in terms of plans and pricing but also being able to sync any folder with ease.

So which one is your favorite, and according to you, which should be the champion? Please feel free to share your comments and thanks for reading!

Final Winner: SugarSync

10 thoughts on “SugarSync vs Dropbox”

  1. Hi, why did you cease publishing my critical comment on Sugarsync? Your test is not truth!

    1. Peter, I revised the comment history, but I couldn’t find your comment. Please resubmit. Thanks.

  2. Hi! I use both; one as part of a collaborative group and the other as a personal filesharing/backup during roadtrips. May I suggest you add what I’d call an “Administrivia” or “Problem Resolution” evaluation checkpoint; how they handle installing/billing/error resolution/complaint issues. An ex-QA-automation maven, I can and DO routinely break software, uh, I mean, ‘uncover it’s limitations’, and I am constantly dealing with this administrivia issue. While Dropbox has a Forum, and both have FAQs and good answers within; my issue was not listed in either company’s help data or FAQ list, and I’ve (AGAIN, same situation, easily replicated, happened last month) been locked out of my account! I won’t say WHO, let them BOTH look at how they expect us to handle stuff like this without any ability to reach a live tech or even expedite resolution! I don’t need access once I return from my trip TOMORROW, and I’m only using cloud storage for this very situation. So I’m suggesting some category to cover what most of us will, unfortunately, have to utilize during the business relationship – their administrivia or human response. I DON’T mean a cute autoresponder message that you know and appreciate my problem, I mean, when did it actually get resolved and how. Again, I have BOTH, and I still have to make sure what I MIGHT need is on USB devices because they can’t help OR escalate without humans. Perhaps having these two companies resolve an identical support issue will allow you to more easily demarcate the winner/leader. Thanx for your work!

  3. I’ve used both services and SugarSync is far better and easier to use, IMO (windows user). I have 3 personal computers (cheap lightweight ASUS laptop, regular laptop that’s usually at home, and a slowly dying laptop that’s always at home) that I use, an iPhone, and work in 3 different locations across multiple desktop computers. For my 3 personal laptops I have the documents and photos folders synced. I can access the latest version of literally ALL of my files on any of my 3 compueters AND my iPhone AND the web at any time. If I’m in the office, I go to the website and download the files that I need to work on at that time, then re-upload them to Sugarsync when I’m done. By the time I get home, those edited files are in the My Docs folder on my laptop (and my phone, too!). It’s like having my own personal network across my devices.
    Another benefit is the file sharing – just right click on any file that’s synced (for me, anything in my docs) click on “copy public link”, send the link to someone, and they have instant access to the file. You can also share an entire folder this way.

  4. I too am a big fan of Sugarsync and use it in a fashion identical to Jen. However you should be aware of it’s limitations. If you have a complex, deep folder structure it will not work. So if you have more than ~256 characters in your path it bombs. There are some folders on my machines that cannot be synced! Secondly, one cannot control WHEN folders are synced; it always happens ASAP. So if you have lots of folders to up or download and you PAY FOR DATA (think satellite for redundancy) then you’d like to time when the sync to your repository takes place. Sugarsync can’t do it. Probably neither can the others…just thought the corner cases should be mentioned.

  5. You know that you can get 5 GB of free storage w/ SugarSync, right? It’s not advertised on the homepage, but if you scroll to ‘Download’ and download the software and create a new userid/password, voila! Free 5 GB of storage.

  6. I use sugarsync. But living in Europe can make the download very slow sometimes since the servers are located in the US.

  7. Two huge positives of Dropbox: LAN sync and block-level sync (ie only the bits of the actual file that changes is re-synched. This is a HUGE benefit if you have bandwidth constraints.
    btw I use Sugarsync because of the multiple folder sync, but I constantly debate about changing back to Dropbox due to block-level sync

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More about

Most Visited News